> From: Tim Dugger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am sorry, but I have only been paying half-way attention to this > thread. Now, I thought that Wizards was the one who used the term in > their own SRD. If that is the case, then they cannot claim that an > employee made a mistake and recall it. Of couse they can. > If they can do that, it makes the > whole OGL nothing more than a sham in my opinion. See my previous message. Failure to act to remove content that they do not wish to license with the OGL will be construed as de facto permission for it to be so licensed. Wizards (in the form of me, Keith, Anthony, and Andy, and others) have been very clear since day 1 that "Dungeon Master" was not to be considered Open Game Content, and there are numerous references to such a policy in the available public record. > If any other company released something by accident, there is > no way that > they could pull it back in according to everything that I > have heard. The > same goes for this. It depends on who authorized the publication, and how effective the company would be at demonstrating that the release was an unauthorized, unintended >error<. Ryan _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
