But any such database by nature will always be incomplete. There is nothing compelling anyone to add their stuff to a depository.
Bryan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Meerschaert Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] RE(2): Independently Designed OGC/PI Clashes Mike Dymond wrote: >This is a tricky conundrum. The only solution I can think of is a PI >repository, but that seems to have been snubbed by the rest of the list. > > An OGC directory, wherein we can all have a list of what OGC comes from where, is very much a going concern. It's just needing to have some bits and pieces cleaned up. (Better to do it right the first time than waste the effort of data collection.) Soon--as in, within the next month--we should have a public database to share Section 15 entries and OGC allocations, so that we can all look at where a particular spell, feat, or new rule came from (and maybe even where it shows up.) DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
