If you want to do your own thing, fine. most of the people her have just been trying to be helpful and point out what WOTC has said their policy is. If you can't go along, and feel the need to make waves, till all the wind mills you want.
ken
 
Gygax is to Gaming what Kirby was to comics
Alas poor Elric I was a thousand times more evil than you
http://www.geocities.com/J_Elric_Smith/Index.html
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Possible Formation of Project

In a message dated 8/2/03 5:09:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


I only need to accept things I'm not willing to go to the mat over.  I'd be willing to go to the mat with Hasbro over something like this.  Even were it time consuming, costly, etc.  I would not risk other legal battles with Hasbro, but this I would were I so inclined to write such a piece of software.

If Hasbro wants to de facto rewrite clauses into the license, then they should release a new license.

There are clearly classes of potential OGC (sounds, etc.) which are not human readable.

Additionally, if I OGC'd a sound and you reproduced it by mixing it with other sounds and declared the result OGC, then it may be utterly impossible to ever sift out my OGC from the composite recording, and being a set of noises, it may never be something that could be read or the original even extracted again in the future.

Therefore human readability is not a requirement.  See also my recent comments on proprietary word processing files.

Lee

Reply via email to