I'm not referring to its viral, semi-viral, or whatever-you-want-to-call-it nature. I'm referring to things like no requirement to make the OGC easily available in an editable format, or the actual hostility of the license to proper source tracking. *Those*, plus the PI bits, are the parts that i think undermine the goal of open-content development.
I agree. A license revision permitting the attribution of rules and unmodified text to a contributor using the copyright notice from their Section 15 would be a valuable change to the OGL. It's about the only theoretical revision that would have a real effect, IMO.
DM
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
