A colleague of mine had been working on an SRD variant and had actually issued a credit that most of the volume was derived from another source (which he named). This raised the question as to whether most people think credits and references to items in your Section 15 constitute "compatibility" declarations, or whether only a strict, facial declaration of "compatibility" is to be deemed compatible.
In my personal opinion I tend to feel that if you want to make such a declaration, just ask. Most people don't mind credits that help push their products. So I'd tend to play it safe.
Another major vendor just released this as OGC under the d20 STL:
"Although a half-orc can multiclass freely
between half-orc levels and either orc or human levels, he cannot take levels in both orc and human. For more on orc racial levels, see Savage Species from Wizards of the Coast."
Since this work was declared as OGC and since it was under the STL this seems to be a violation of the no WotC trademarks under the STL. It also seems to be a violation of OGC declarations, since everything was declared as OGC without properly designating this stuff as either "non-OGC" or as PI. Lastly (and most related to the post), is this a statement of compatibility? It seems to be an implied one if not an explicit one.
Lee
- RE: [Ogf-l] Re: Credits/Compatibility HUDarklord
- RE: [Ogf-l] Re: Credits/Compatibility Bryan Gillispie
