On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Absolutely not true. If I have a work that consists of > > ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ and I designate W as product identity and N to Z > > as open content, then A to M is closed content. > > Based on what lines of the license? The license explicitly says that > OGC means the covered work is OGC except the parts that are PI. It > then says you have to clearly designate the open stuff.
Lee, This topic has been debated on this list (among others) for years now. Hundreds of books have been published using the OGL. Is there even one publisher (the people who have their money on the line, and who hopefully have consulted with actual lawyers about the finer points of the license) out there who doesn't believe in the interpretation of the OGL that there are three types of content (Open, closed, and PI)? Are there any drafters of the license who don't believe in the existence of closed content? Can you point to any statement from WotC in an FAQ or in a list debate where they state that they interpret the OGL to not include the possibility of closed content? Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
