Re: [Ogf-l] The Myth Of Closed Content?

[david_shepheard]

----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 1:00 PM So, woodelf can release a piece of art as 100% PI under the OGL.  Then he can sublicense it to me.  Then I can use it without trying to come up with some complex definition of what is and is not the covered work in a compilation.  I can just drop his artwork in my work, note that it is woodelf's PI, it was declared as PI by woodelf, and that he has licensed it to me, and that my use of it does not constitute a challenge of his ownership.   Hey, sounds like you think I got it right [1] a while back when I said that the "anti-cripplers" could release a PIed document as useful as the SRD and issue it under a special PI licence (Anti-Crippling Licence) that only allows people that don't cripple content to benifit from it.   I think these strange debates are actually teaching me stuff!   David S   [1] As a legal statement, not a moral one or a tactically sucessful one.

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l