On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:57:37 +0100 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you are inferring things here that haven't been said. You > make it sound as if publishers don't want some people to reuse > OGC after releasing it. As far as I know the only people that > talk about not using more than a certain percentage or waiting > 6 months are OGC reusers *not* suppliers.
There are publishers who have commented that essentially reprinting an entire book while it's still on the stands trying to make its break-even point is a bit gauche. > From what I recall there is at least one product out there that > has used OGC from something else *before* that other thing was > published! If we're talking about the one I'm thinking of, the situation should be rectified shortly with the publication of the delayed first (or second, depending on how you look at it) book. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
