I'm with Ryan. I have serious, serious concern about
the legality of OSRIC.

I'll summarize as follows:

I found out about it when someone emailed me: "Is this
legal?" and sent me the link. I emailed back: "I
wouldnt touch that with a 10' pole."

Clark

--- Ryan Dancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Re:OSRIC
> 
> Their license page is simply incorrect in many of
> its assertations.
> 
> To the extent that the charts of ability scores do
> not represent a
> non-linear mathmatical function (i.e., the figures
> are arbitrarily made up
> by the original writer) they're protected by
> copyright and can't be reused
> without permission.
> 
> To the extent that the class & racial limitations
> and individual power
> descriptions and level dependent abilities and game
> modifiers match those of
> AD&D (any edition) and are not the result of a
> simple linear mathematical
> function, those templates represent selection,
> arrangement and presentation
> copyrights inherent in AD&D and suffer the same
> limitations.
> 
> Spell names which are not OGC but are in AD&D and
> are "not obvious" (i.e.
> they contain some creative element) are copyright by
> WotC.
> 
> The 'to hit' charts, to the extent that they
> represent non-linear functions,
> are protected by WotC copyright.
> 
> In summary:  I wouldn't touch this without SERIOUS
> work to ensure everything
> I used was actually OGC.
> 
> Ryan
> > _______________________________________________
> Ogf-l mailing list
> Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
>
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
> 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to