ogf-l  

Messages by Date

• 2003/02/23 [Ogf-l] SRD Revision? DarkTouch
• 2003/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC declaration. Damian
• 2003/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC declaration. Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/23 [Ogf-l] OGC declaration. Charles Gray
• 2003/02/22 RE: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable? Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/21 [Ogf-l] Mongoose on the move Mark Oliva
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Tir Gwaith
• 2003/02/21 [Ogf-l] New d20 Publisher Peter Donis
• 2003/02/21 RE: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable? Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable? Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable? Alec Burkhardt
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers HUDarklord
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Deities and DemiGods Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers HUDarklord
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable ? Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable ? (was: Deities and DemiGods) Fred
• 2003/02/21 RE: [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/21 [Ogf-l] WoTC PI to OGC Timetable ? (was: Deities and DemiGods) Matthew Hodgson
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Scott Broadbent
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Bill Olander
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] OGL and non-disclosure agreements. Charles Gray
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers John Nephew
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] d20 card to WotC Reginald Cablayan
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] OGL Declarations and publishers Steve Creech
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] Off-thread with Mongoose and "What is/isn't OGC" The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] Easy OGL Compliance or, "I give you these 15... *crash* ... er, 6 commandments!" Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" HUDarklord
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] Easy OGL Compliance or, "I give you these 15... *crash* ... er, 6 commandments!" The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] d20 card to WotC paul . king
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Deities and DemiGods Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/20 RE: [Ogf-l] Deities and DemiGods Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" Alec Burkhardt
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] Deities and DemiGods Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" HUDarklord
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" HUDarklord
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] RE: To Clark and Blacksway... The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] Mongoose - Specific Questions - "is this OGC" The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] Uneasy about "Rules are OGC, text is not" The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] To Clark and Blacksway... Steve Creech
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] To Clark and Blacksway... Mac Golden
• 2003/02/20 [Ogf-l] To Clark and Blacksway... The Sigil
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation Clarity Sam Judson
• 2003/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] My Previous Post... Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/19 [Ogf-l] My Previous Post... The Sigil
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/19 RE: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Bryan Fields
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Justin Bacon
• 2003/02/19 RE: [Ogf-l] Renaissance Weaponry & Cunning thought Brad Thompson
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/19 RE: [Ogf-l] Renaissance Weaponry & Cunning thought M Jason Parent
• 2003/02/19 [Ogf-l] OGC Designation Clarity The Sigil
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Tir Gwaith
• 2003/02/19 [Ogf-l] Renaissance Weaponry & Cunning thought GRIM
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Hal Whitewyrm
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Bryan Gillispie
• 2003/02/19 [Ogf-l] Correct S.15 declaration Hal Whitewyrm
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/19 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Tom Caudron
• 2003/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Martin Cutbill
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights woodelf
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights woodelf
• 2003/02/18 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights woodelf
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Fred
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Simple and (hopefully) quick question... Marty Minick
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Ryan S. Dancey
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Thankyou! GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Brad Thompson
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Lizard
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] New d20 Publisher Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Lizard
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Brad Thompson
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Lizard
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Tim Dugger
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Sixten Otto
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Lizard
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] New d20 Publisher Peter Donis
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Lizard
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Brad Thompson
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Slaad and Summon Monster Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats HUDarklord
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Slaad and Summon Monster Damian Smart
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Scott Metzger
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Slaad and Summon Monster Scott Metzger
• 2003/02/18 RE: [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf Ryan S. Dancey
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Steve Donohue
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Head-swimmingly complex legal bumf GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Hello Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Hello GRIM
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Scott Metzger
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Michael Cortez
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Martin Cutbill
• 2003/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/18 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Reginald Cablayan
• 2003/02/18 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Martin Cutbill
• 2003/02/18 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/17 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Merric Blackman
• 2003/02/17 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Tir Gwaith
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Fred
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Arthur King of Britain
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights woodelf
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/17 [Ogf-l] Re: Mongoose & Ultimate Feats Justin Bacon
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights paul . king
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Alex de Morris
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2003/02/17 RE: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2003/02/17 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights trustrum
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Lizard
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Just for the fun of it... Justin Bacon
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC-Considered Reviews (was Re: OGC designation clarity) Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/17 [Ogf-l] Re: OGC designation clarity Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Rogers Cadenhead
• 2003/02/17 Re: [Ogf-l] 3.5 edition D&D and d20/OGL paul . king
• 2003/02/17 [Ogf-l] 3.5 edition D&D and d20/OGL Matthew Hodgson
• 2003/02/17 RE: [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Matthew Hodgson
• 2003/02/17 [Ogf-l] Monsters removed from the SRD & Copyrights Nate & Camille Jones
• 2003/02/16 [Ogf-l] OGC-Considered Reviews (was Re: OGC designation clarity) Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/16 Re: OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/16 Re: OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/16 Re: OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest,Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/16 Re: OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Clark Peterson
• 2003/02/16 Re: [Ogf-l] SRD Spell Descriptions Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/16 [Ogf-l] SRD Spell Descriptions Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/14 Re: OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Mike Kletch
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! HUDarklord
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats HUDarklord
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Ol' Ben
• 2003/02/14 [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #750 - 11 msgs sigfried trent
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/14 OGC designation clarity (was: Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs) Tom Caudron
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! HUDarklord
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/14 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Mike Looney
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Mike Looney
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats HUDarklord
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Faustus von Goethe
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Mongoose Publishing & Ultimate Feats HUDarklord
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Lizard
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! Doug Meerschaert
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Joe Mucchiello
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #747 - 12 msgs Matthew Sprange
• 2003/02/14 Re: [Ogf-l] The SRD has been updated! HUDarklord

• Earlier messages
• Later messages