On Sun, 21 May 2000, Brad Thompson wrote: > > J. Michael Looney > > > > This makes _me_ much happier, given my current state of confusion, caused > > by the land sharks, over what _software_ is. > > > > I would say that this is a _much_ better option than forcing GPL, at least > > to me. > > I think the confusion is mostly illusionary. While data files can be > considered software, the GPL doesn't talk about software, it talks about > programs. It would be very hard to classify a PDF file as a program. > True, however Ryan's original change was "software", not "software programs" or "computer programs". I think the "must include human readable format" version is a much better option than GPL. -- http://www.spellbooksoftware.com If guns are outlawed can we use swords? ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Ron Bedison
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Jared Nielsen
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OT: Why prog... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OT: Why prog... Jared Nielsen
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to Li... Jared Nielsen
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change ... Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... Jared Nielsen
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to Li... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change ... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Cha... J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to License Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to License J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to License Adam J
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Proposed Change to License Ryan S. Dancey
