In a message dated 8/21/00 11:17:28 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If you made a habit of publishing OGC monsters in > every Guild Companion magazine and I republished all of them as a stand- > alone for-profit supplement with none of my own content, I don't think > you would be experiencing pleasant thoughts. But that would be your right under the OGL as it stands. And if you made money, that would be your money. And the Guild Companion folks know it to. Which is why they will likely not put something truly cool and unique into OGC just to avoid that circumstance. Which is *their* right under the OGL. -Paul @ CFE/NSG www.teamfrog.com "Leech-O-Matic" ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Infinite Possibilities
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks John Nephew
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Rem... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Adam J
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Infinite Possibilities
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Tim Dugger
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Infinite Possibilities
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks John Nephew
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Walter Christensen
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Consolidated Remarks Mathew Gray
