From: "Brad Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm certainly not worried about having enough open content...I think there's > plenty of room for both. One question though - will Dragon or Dungeon > accept OGL material for submission? My hope is that they will. Once the license is finalized, I plan to sit down with those guys and talk about how that could be accomplished. I'd like them to start putting the D20 logo on the cover of the magazines, too. Ryan ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good for Open ... Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Martin L. Shoemaker
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is G... Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" ... Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is G... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is G... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Corey Reid
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is G... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is G... Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... Mathew Gray
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Why "Closed" is Good ... FrogGod
