I don't disagree, but THe limits and requirments of the document are defined by its
initial purpose yes?
Rogers Cadenhead wrote:
> At 10:38 AM 8/23/00 -0500, John of the Collective <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In short, I think we've reached the limit of our comparison with Open source.
> >The OGL was simply never intended to be THAT open.
>
> The open gaming community doesn't have to be defined so narrowly
> that it becomes a D&D Developer's Network. It should be more
> expansive than that, and even the OGL's drafter says that it can
> readily be applied to other systems.
>
> Rogers Cadenhead
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: http://www.prefect.com
> -------------
> For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
