> Faustus von Goethe > > This means - you MUST strip out all trademarks, except as specifically > allowed by the OGL contributor - from ANY work you intend to OGL - unless > the original author "opens" that mark for general use - something that is > very unlikely to happen for D&D. > > At least this is the way I have been reading it, and Ryan's comments have > *seemed* to back up my interpretation .... I think you have it right. I read it to mean that you must remove all trademarks from any work containing OGL material for which you do not have explicit permission to use. However, it is fine to use another's mark with permission in closed content and not be available for general use. -Brad ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... Martin L. Shoemaker
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
- RE: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... Lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs ... Marc Tassin, Ilium Software
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Russ Taylor
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs &quo... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] NO CONTEST! OGL vs "ONL... Faustus von Goethe
