> From: Faustus von Goethe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 02:20 PM
> >From: "Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I believe the DRL fulfils the defintion of an Open Game License. Any
> >objections from the list?
> Agree wholeheartedly!
>
> Tho' we really should codify these "rules"...
How about:
"Open Gaming means two key things:
"1. Game Rules and materials that use those rules that can be freely copied,
modified and distributed.
"2. A system for ensuring that material contributed to the Open Gaming
community will remain Open and cannot be made Closed once contributed."
as per
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/foundation.html
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
