-----Original Message-----
From: Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>2. "I hope they open that up a bit. Do you think I can
>take all the OGC and just give the monsters new names
>from your manual -I don't intend to do this! -I was
>just wondering how you are protected from someone
>doing just that. The stats are OGC."
>
>That is a great point. You could do that. Just like
>you could make a PHB knock off from the d20 material
>from the PHB. That was my main argument why the names
>should be open, too. I also argued that netword
>externalities should drive sales of the CC if other
>people use it and use monsters from it in their d20
>products. I think we just need to realize that some
>people are going to be very conservative in what they
>tag as open content and others are not. I am trying to
>get the people who make the decisions to agree to open
>up the monster names too.
A very good point which I hadn't really considered. Good luck in your
attempts.
Chris
www.IDrankWhat.org
www.coincidental.net
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
