[Open_Gaming] New STL inconsistencies

[Githianki]

The new STL no longer has the "this is unofficial" disclaimer at the top.   This is an oversight I assume? Is the "card" at the bottom of the RTF usable (when printed out) or will there actually be a card.PDF, as referenced in the document, that must be used? Also Sections 8 and 9 are not internally consistent as Section 8 makes no mention of the 90 day distribution limit for pre-existing material.   Furthermore, where does the chain of responsilbility end for complying with this distribution restriction? Is a producer responsible for a retailer that still carries a product on their shelves or sells it after 90 days?  What about at the consumer level?  It seems an unreasonable (and expensive) burden to have to track down all existing copies of a product that might be older just to comply with a new license version.  This is assuming that WotC won't grant written permission.  It also seems to grant the ability of WotC to force product recalls (by a simple version change) even if a product was totally compliant under earlier versions of the license.  This is not a good thing as it basically removes any protections a publisher enjoys under the license. &n! ! bsp;Am I missing a valid argument for this type of clause? -Alex Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]