On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Ryan S. Dancey wrote: >You gain essentially >unlimited rights< to copy, modify and distribute Open >Game Content using the OGL. How is that "not open"? The part about giving up rights is not open. The rest of it is wonderful. I don't want to sound unappreciative and I realize there is a long road ahead. >Open Gaming is about >GAMES< not trademarks. I thought it was about publishing for profit *wink* PI is pretty much all encompassing of anything creative. I think many people could have accepted just trademarks. It remains to be seen whether any other projects can successfully operate under the OGL (I realize there are not-for-profit efforts). Happy holidays to everyone. Especially, Ryan, Clark and anyone else I've ranted on. Regards, --Kal ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Mac Golden
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! R. Hyrum Savage
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! GreenRonin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Faustus von Goethe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL vs Uncle Sam--ugh! Clark Peterson
