-----Original Message-----
From: John Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I personally would disagree with #2. I don't see why the
>d20 trademark should be neccessary, and removing it would mean that
>people could do things like release alternate character creation
>systems as "Free20".
Agreed, actually.
>names" bit. There should be room to have a distinctive mark
>for, say, the original makers of a world. However, if all the
>names in the package are PI, then the world really isn't "open" in
>my opinion. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't seem to go
>with the "Free20" concept.
Agreed. Someone's "company" name they should be able to keep as PI.
DM
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
