I can see your point and I think it is not an unreasonable
interpretation of the OGL. But I'm not convinced that survival
of sublicenses 13-OGL doesn't apply. Maybe someone else can
give this more thought or explain how survival of sublicenses
will work in the event of a termination.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, LaPierre, Bob wrote:
> Lets be crystal clear with my comment. Because the law tends to regard
> "whole works" when determining compliance with standards, if any _part_ of a
> document is not in compliance then none of it is. Therefore if the product
> has non-compliant portions then the whole is non-compliant. Therefore the
> "perpetual license" was not in existence for that product. You cannot pick
> and choose, being OGL compliant is like being pregnant, you are or you
> aren't period. It isn't taking away your rights because they were never
> really there.
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
