ogf-l  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Mike Looney
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kele Kravelin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Robert Kozak
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Neal Rogers
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Lynn Fredricks
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Faustus von Goethe
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Rogers Cadenhead
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses lizard
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Damian
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Rogers Cadenhead
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Ryan S. Dancey
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses LaPierre, Bob
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Damian
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses LaPierre, Bob
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses lizard
  • Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
• RE: [Ogf-l] Infringement or Not? (An informal questionnaire) Brad Thompson
  • [Ogf-l] Infringement or Not? (An informal questionnaire) Neal Rogers
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Infringement or Not? (An informal questionnaire) Neal Rogers
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Infringement or Not? (An informal questionnaire) Ryan S. Dancey
• [Ogf-l] OGL is kinda restrictive. dema
  • Re: [Ogf-l] OGL is kinda restrictive. Neal Rogers
  • Re: [Ogf-l] OGL is kinda restrictive. Adam Dray
• [Ogf-l] More can you copyright a system? dema
  • RE: [Ogf-l] More can you copyright a system? Jaimi McEntire
  • Re: [Ogf-l] More can you copyright a system? Neal Rogers
• [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes Jonathan Young
• [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Jonathan Young
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Damian Smart
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? FrogGod
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Damian Smart
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? William Olander
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Attribute Changes? Ryan S. Dancey
• [Ogf-l] RE: [Ogf-l]Feats (was: I'm Game) LaPierre, Bob
  • Re: [Ogf-l] RE: [Ogf-l]Feats (was: I'm Game) Faustus von Goethe
• [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? dema
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? William Olander
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Neal Rogers
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? dema
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? dema
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? William Olander
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? William Olander
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Alec A. Burkhardt
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Alec A. Burkhardt
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Robert Kozak
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? John Kim
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Lynn Fredricks
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Website needs a review and comments- Ryan, anyone? Ryan S. Dancey
• [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ mupHicks
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ Reginald Cablayan
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ mupHicks
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ Damian Smart
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Re: [Open_Gaming] New to the list - See the FAQ muphicks
• [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? dema
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Chad Thornton
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? John Kim
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? dema
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? lizard
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? John Kim
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Neal Rogers
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Neal Rogers
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Brad Thompson
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Neal Rogers
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Can you copyright a system of doing things? Ryan S. Dancey
• [Ogf-l] OPEN APOLOGY TO THE GROUP Faustus von Goethe
• [Ogf-l] OGL typographical quirks Kal Lin
• Hasbro Infogames deal; Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Kyle Rode
  • Re: Hasbro Infogames deal; Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: Hasbro Infogames deal; Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Dan Ridenhour
  • Re: Hasbro Infogames deal; Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Kevin Tatroe
• [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended John Nephew
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended John Nephew
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended John Nephew
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Ryan S. Dancey
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Kevin Kenan
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] no offense to the mouse genus intended Will Hindmarch
• [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Kevin Tatroe
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Mike Looney
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? lizard
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Max Skibinsky
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Max Skibinsky
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? FrogGod
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Robert Kozak
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Software developers? Doug Meerschaert
• [Ogf-l] Making a game out of the SRD John Kim
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Making a game out of the SRD Kal Lin
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Making a game out of the SRD Martin L. Shoemaker
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Making a game out of the SRD John Kim
• [Ogf-l] Mucking with the SRD. Alan Kellogg
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Mucking with the SRD. Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Mucking with the SRD. Doug Meerschaert
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Mucking with the SRD. Walter Christensen
• [Ogf-l] Look out for Dire Hedgehogs Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Look out for Dire Hedgehogs Faustus von Goethe
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Look out for Dire Hedgehogs Mike Looney
• [Ogf-l] Web site questions RazerD
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Web site questions Grok
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Web site questions RazerD
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Web site questions Grok
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Web site questions Marc Tassin, Ilium Software
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Web site questions Guy McLimore
• [Ogf-l] An observation on the SRD FAQ Neal Rogers
  • RE: [Ogf-l] An observation on the SRD FAQ Brad Thompson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] An observation on the SRD FAQ John Kim
  • Re: [Ogf-l] An observation on the SRD FAQ Neal Rogers
• [Ogf-l] Woo hoo! John Nephew
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Woo hoo! R. Hyrum Savage
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Woo hoo! Doug Meerschaert
• [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... Mike Looney
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... Martin L. Shoemaker
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... Robert Kozak
  • [Ogf-l] All hail Ryan Dancey Martin L. Shoemaker
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... John J. Kaufman
  • [Ogf-l] Come On... Clark Peterson
  • Re: [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... John Nephew
  • RE: [Ogf-l] Ok, It's afternoon now... Alec A. Burkhardt

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]