Re: [Ogf-l] SRD, Computer Junk, and Going Nuts...

[Doug Meerschaert]

-----Original Message-----
From: Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>  I have viloated the OGL by not clearly identifying OGC. Now a.Person is
in
>no way responsible for this. Likewise A.Person distributes a binary file
and
>a text file together, the text file states that the binary is OGC.


A.Person should, just to be safe, only distribute the files in "one work"
form--as a single self-installing EXE, a ZIP, or on a single disk or disk
image.

>  As for the second paragraph then their is no requirement for me when
>resuing OGC that is in bold in one product to keep it in bold and tell
>people that its OGC if its in bold. The requirement is for me to clearly
>identify it! how the person I obtained it from did it is irrelavent. If I
>choose not to redistribute the text file which as you say cannot be
>required, then that is fine so long as "I find another way to clearly
>identify OGC"


Exactly.  At least, that makes sense given all that I've seen.


DM

_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l