>> Clark Peterson wrote: >> >> >Did I just airball on this? Did Ryan approve of OGC >> >under the OGL through the GNU License? If so I missed >> >it an I appologize. >> >
>> From: Doug Meerschaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> That's OK. I'm having a hard time FINDING a message where >> he did it. :( >> Okay, it took awhile but I think these are the relevent messages. I suggest reading them all... On GPL & OGL: http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/pipermail/ogf-l/2001-August/001254.html http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/pipermail/ogf-l/2001-August/001264.html On Binary Dist: http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/pipermail/ogf-l/2001-August/001260.html http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/pipermail/ogf-l/2001-August/001263.html Here is what Eric Said: >> The OGS distribution contains a copy of the SRD in >> HTML format. The SRD is covered by the OGL and the >> OGS distribution contains a copy of the OGL within >> this directory. The SRD is the only >> "Open Game Content" in the OGS distribution. All >> other content in this distribution is free software >> covered by the GNU GPL. Based on those emails by Ryan, and without looking at the source code, I do not think that this "OGS" complies. Since Ryan states, in his opionin to be in complience, you would have to Ryan Said: >> In addition, define the whole work as >> "Open Game Content", and license it >> >as well< with the OGL. Eric states that only the copy of the SRD included is marked as OGC, and released under the OGL. He also states that the rest is released ONLY under the GPL. -- Michael Cortez http://www.OGExchange.com Promoting the Exchange of 100% Open Gaming Material _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
