----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: RE: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies
> > From: Reginald Cablayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I want your educated opinion, is this a good thing (in legal > > and practical > > sense) for both third-party publishers and PI owner AEG? > > I think it's a good thing; it's harmless legally, and defines a range of > materials that you can use in essentially the same safe harbor as the > OGL. > > The challenge will be for AEG to ever take action to enforce it, but > then "Hida" isn't really something anyone could "own" in the IP sense > anyway. Hypothetically, would WotC consider this legal definition and granting limited use of "goodie" to allow third-party publishers to use, say "Mordenkainen," in the named spell? Of course, it is a moot point since the SRD is declared 100% OGC. But hypothetically... Will other third-party d20 publisher follow AEG's initiative if this term makes it into their final released Covered Product (Rokugan d20)? _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
