ogf-l  

Messages by Date

• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good and Bad and (gasp) I changemy mind! (Long) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good and Bad and (gasp) I change my mind! (Long) lizard
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] Fans and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good and Bad and (gasp) I change my mind! (Long) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] On the Nature of Property (long) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) John Kim
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] Fans and the OGL Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good and Bad and (gasp) I change my mind! (Long) Greg Benage
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] Explanation of "Crippled" (Long) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] Explanation of "Crippled" (Long) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] On the Nature of Property (long) Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] On the Nature of Property (long) Jasyn Jones
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] (d)20 Products - the Good and Bad and (gasp) I change my mind! (Long) The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] On the Nature of Property (long) The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] Fans and the OGL The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] Explanation of "Crippled" (Long) The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] Why PI? (Long) The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] Explanation of "Crippled" (Long) The Sigil
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) korath
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) Greg Benage
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) Faustus von Goethe
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation(Rant)) talisman1
• 2001/11/29 [Ogf-l] Practical Test of Openness (was OGC Designation (Rant)) John Kim
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Faustus von Goethe
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jeff Fox
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Faustus von Goethe
• 2001/11/29 Re: [Ogf-l] (Rant 3) - PI, OGC, and (especially) IP... Tim Dugger
• 2001/11/29 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Tim Dugger
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL GoldRushG
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Faustus von Goethe
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell korath
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] (Rant 3) - PI, OGC, and (especially) IP... Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Faustus von Goethe
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Lizard
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Greg Benage
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] Possible problem with PIing Art Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Possible problem with PIing Art Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] (Rant 3) - PI, OGC, and (especially) IP... The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] (Rant 3) - PI, OGC, and (especially) IP... The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Possible problem with PIing Art GreenRonin
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Bryant Durrell
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] Possible problem with PIing Art Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] Future Versions of OGL nutshell Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/28 OGC Question (was RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant)) Jonathan Thompson
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jonathan Thompson
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] OGC Delineation (Rant) The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jasyn Jones
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jasyn Jones
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jasyn Jones
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Greg Benage
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jonathan Thompson
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) AndyHughey
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Marc Tassin, Ilium Software
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Lenze, Troy, (DC-Cap)
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Jonathan Thompson
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] OGC For you and me Robert Baxter
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Marc Tassin, Ilium Software
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) Steven A Cook
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) xen
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) The Sigil
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2001/11/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/28 RE: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/28 [Ogf-l] Re: Future Versions of the OGL Justin Bacon
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Lizard
• 2001/11/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Scott
• 2001/11/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Richard Stewart
• 2001/11/27 [Ogf-l] Future Versions of the OGL Steve Peterson
• 2001/11/27 [Ogf-l] ANN: OGC Directory Michael Cortez
• 2001/11/26 Re: [Ogf-l] D20 Publisher List and Product List Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
• 2001/11/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Ogf-d20-l] D20 Publisher List and Product List Marc Tassin, Ilium Software
• 2001/11/25 Re: [Ogf-l] D20 Publisher List and Product List Master 0one
• 2001/11/20 Re: [Ogf-l] reusing licenses (Hey Clark!) Jeffrey J. Visgaitis
• 2001/11/19 RE: [Ogf-l] reusing licenses (was Re:AEG's PI and Goodies) Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/19 RE: [Ogf-l] reusing licenses (was Re:AEG's PI and Goodies) Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2001/11/19 [Ogf-l] reusing licenses (was Re:AEG's PI and Goodies) maggie
• 2001/11/19 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Rob Lowry
• 2001/11/18 [Ogf-l] (no subject) Giles Kiser
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies GoldRushG
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies GoldRushG
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Reginald Cablayan
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Reginald Cablayan
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/17 RE: [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/17 [Ogf-l] AEG's PI and Goodies Reginald Cablayan
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/17 Re: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Dave & Natalie
• 2001/11/16 Re: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/16 RE: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/16 Re: [Ogf-l] License Placement on a Web Site Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/16 Re: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/16 RE: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Michael Cortez
• 2001/11/16 [Ogf-l] License Placement on a Web Site William Hindmarch
• 2001/11/16 Re: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Infinite Possibilities
• 2001/11/16 RE: [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/16 [Ogf-l] The Muddy waters of the Safe Harbor Curtis Bennett
• 2001/11/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 15 and the SRD reference Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/14 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 15 and the SRD reference Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/14 [Ogf-l] Section 15 and the SRD reference paul . king
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? John Kim
• 2001/11/13 RE: [Ogf-l] can they do this? Richard Stewart
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? Damian
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? GoldRushG
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? Damian
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? GoldRushG
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? Damian
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? GoldRushG
• 2001/11/13 RE: [Ogf-l] can they do this? William Olander
• 2001/11/13 Re: [Ogf-l] can they do this? Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/13 [Ogf-l] can they do this? Jim Clepis
• 2001/11/12 RE: [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) Lewis Stoddart
• 2001/11/12 [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) paul . king
• 2001/11/12 RE: [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/12 RE: [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) Lewis Stoddart
• 2001/11/12 RE: [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2001/11/12 [Ogf-l] Section 15 & netbooks (was:Section 15 revisited) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/12 [Ogf-l] Site update Jonathan M. Thompson
• 2001/11/12 [Ogf-l] Re: Section 15 revisited paul . king
• 2001/11/10 [Ogf-l] Index Method Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/10 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/10 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/09 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/09 Re: [Ogf-l] (no subject) Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/09 [Ogf-l] (no subject) The Sigil
• 2001/11/09 [Ogf-l] (no subject) The Sigil
• 2001/11/09 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Richard Stewart
• 2001/11/09 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 15, revisited Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/09 [Ogf-l] Section 15, revisited paul . king
• 2001/11/09 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/09 Re: [Ogf-l] More "OGL/D20" than Open Gaming General Topics Rogers Cadenhead
• 2001/11/09 RE: [Ogf-l] DRL (was:New Open Gaming subject) William Olander
• 2001/11/09 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject maggie
• 2001/11/09 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Dave & Natalie
• 2001/11/09 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Dave & Natalie
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Rob Lowry
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject maggie
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Rob Lowry
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] RE: More "OGL/D20" than Open Gaming General Topics korath
• 2001/11/08 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/08 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/07 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Richard Stewart
• 2001/11/07 RE: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/07 Re: [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject GoldRushG
• 2001/11/07 [Ogf-l] New Open Gaming subject Clint Jackson
• 2001/11/07 Re: [Ogf-l] Names & Stuff Gary
• 2001/11/05 Re: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses GoldRushG
• 2001/11/05 Re: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses GoldRushG
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Richard Stewart
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Doug Meerschaert
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Michael Cortez
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Re: Announcing the first release of the Open Gaming System Mike Looney
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] Misperception of OGL Copyright Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] D20 Dragon Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Clark Peterson
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Lizard
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/04 Re: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Sean Michael Mead
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Ryan S. Dancey
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses woodelf (lists)
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses Brad Thompson
• 2001/11/04 RE: [Ogf-l] multiple licenses woodelf (lists)

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]