> It might help if every comparison you made wasn't to a NON-Open product. > The fact that all of your comparisons are to items not published under the > OGL (NWN, Master Tools, Player's Handbook) certainly does nothing to > support your claims that the OGL is allowing these people to behave > differently than you would be able to behave under the OGL.
Actually this is misunderstanding of my position. NWN & MT were used as examples to eliminate Open Source as viable option, only that. Of course these projects has nothing to do with OGL. My comparisons are about OGL derived rights for paper-based publishers and software publishers. Theoreticaly they should be equal, practically they are not. Brad nailed it - its very elegant way to block most types of software, without loosing the face of appearing to be "unopen". > to be like NWN, Master Tools or PH do what they did - either own all > the material yourself or pay the owner to use the material. As you probably aware both options are unavaiable. - Max _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
