[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Which "powers that be" are those? The folks at WotC's legal department? Or >the former employee who is no longer in a position to provide "official" >responses from said legal department? > That same former employee, along with his replacements at WotC, where he doesn't speak for them.
>If all one is after is an opinion that supports one's own, or just any old >opinion, for that matter, then by all means, happy digging to all. But I can >post opinions here, as well. And my opinion is that opinions about WotC's >opinions about what the court *might* someday have an opinion on is a >horribly irresponsible thing to build a "knowledge base" upon when running a >business or dealing with the legal pretzel that is the OGL. <LOL> > Anyone who comes here looking for what a court, company, or individual might say is deluding themselves. OTOH, those who come asking "is this how it is" are probably in the right place. WotC won't answer questions like that unless you've got a product allready printed; hence, the second-best place, here, is the proper forum. DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
