Hello Faustus >From The Desk of Wolfy at Money Talks Enterprises,
On 16-Jan-02, you wrote: > Jasyn, see the subject line. The discussion is not about whether we want > to steal WotC stuff or have them give out more of it. It is whether the > sparse descriptions are good or bad for WotC (and by extension, the D20 > market in general.) > > I personally think the case can be maintained that divergent descriptions > of the same monster is a bad thing... > > Faust And may I add trying to add divergent descriptions and habits to extremely well-known 20 year old monsters with shaky ancestry at that! It's not that you can't it just doesn't make any sense. Nobody wants to. In the final analasis, We are creating fully fleshed out New creatures (aliens too) for Mutazoids3e and a few pages or so of slightly adjusted SRD material to show how easily the stuff can be converted by fans, and that's about it. The animals and vermin will be used pretty much intact, but the vast majority of SRD creatures will be left behind permanently. One exception is the treant which oddly enough might work just beautifully in Mutazoids3e. On the other hand, some creatures in the SRD are new to me, because I stopped playing DnD about 10 yrs ago. One of my developers and I are truly at a loss as to what many of the creatures in the SRD really do look like. But I could still convert the stats to Mutazoids standard and Include them, but Like I said I barely know what they are and at least a few of my potential players won't either. Mutazoids, The Rebellion is on! -- Wolfy http://www.mutazoids.com/ ICQ- 13469530 AIM- Wolfy2264 _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
