From: "Alec A. Burkhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > considered as identifying marks. Both Clark & I (two people with law > degrees - he's a practicing attorney, I am not) have stated that the > descriptive list is exhaustive (i.e. those are the only types of things > that can be identifying marks) due to the closed nature of the language > used.
Also note that Ryan (and by extrapolation, we can assume the Wizards' legal team) have said he believes it to be merely non-exclusive. Not that I have any idea who's right.....just that the guys with the briefcases see it the other way. -Damian _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
