"the name of any feat that anyone produces in a work
covered by the OGL must be open game content.
I take it this would go through for monster and spell
names too."

I'm not following you.

I believe if you use content and it is derivative of
OGC then that new content is covered by the license.

So if you use a feat or a spell, that stuff is must be
open content from a open source (the srd or another
producer) or it must be newly created ogc by you.

Thats where the problem lies. Using non-OGC content
(such as a non-ogc feat) doesnt fall in one of the two
situations above.

Now, that OGC could be PI'd. But that isnt what WotC
has done. 

Clark

=====
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to