Clark said:
> "since something cannot be both Open Game Content and > PI" > > Not quite right. > > You were almost there. > I think my argument pretty much relies entirely on the above point and the question interests me anyway so I'll post a follow-up here. 1(d) of the OGL actually seems fairly explicit regarding this where it says in the definition of Open Game Content "....but specifically excludes Product Identity." and 1(e) says "...and which specifically excludes the open game content." These two taken together sound like: Open Game Content <--> ~(Product Identity) Steven Palmer Peterson www.Second-World-Simulations.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
