Clark Peterson wrote: >But bottom line is WotC doesnt want you doing it. >Pushing may just cause WotC to scrap the project. Lets >not piss in the pool. > In a questionable case like this, the proper procedure is to do it, NOT publishing it or adveritising it, and then ask for comment. WotC's people on this list have historically not liked to talk about hypotheticals, and try and limit their time and statements to specifics.
By neither printing or advertising a work that skirts the edges, you're showing due caution, and is different than "pissing in the pool." Just be careful, and be ready to scrap the entire thing if it doesn't work out well. Oh, and try NOT to use their specifically identified trademarks. That might be a red flag for them. DM P.S: I'm merely advising a way to get them to say something one way or another. PLEASE be wary if you follow my advice--and remember that there's a reason I only have $.37 to my name. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
