>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:27:53 -0400 >From: Joe Mucchiello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Ogf-l digest, Vol 1 #588 - 12 msgs >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >At 09:57 PM 9/26/2002 +0000, Justin Bacon wrote: > >Morden's Transformation" isn't a problem, but some of the spell names > >you've come up with here just look like typos. Unless I (as a customer) > >already know that you're coping with WotC's decision to exclude all >proper > >names from spells, using these names will just look sloppy. And if I, as >a > >customer, already know that you're coping with WotC's decision to exclude > >all proper names from spells, then I don't really need the new names. > >That's everyone's assessment of it. Do you have a solution?
I must have missed some posts. The only replies I saw in response to Clark's posts were kudos (which he certainly deserves for taking the initative) -- I saw no one comment, as I did, that his solution didn't really seem to solve the problem. My solution would be to come up with a set of names which are clearly distinct, but easily correlated. Morden is a good example of what we need; Tanser or Bibgy is not. Justin Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
