<<Translation does not obviate the need for clear identification. The output
is only one aspect of the software. Simply identifying the output is not
sufficient to indicate the OGC that might exist within the code itself.
>>
I concur. While I think the gag about hieroglyphics was made with tongue-planted-firmly-in-cheek (and quite funny, I might add), I think that its sentiment was (perhaps unintentionally) valid.
But I agree with Brad -- a programmer must tell a consumer where the OGC is located. "Buried within the code somewhere" is probably not a sufficiently clear form of identification. "Entirely in this file, which is entirely OGC, and nowhere else", however, would be pretty clear to me as the end user.
Lee
