> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Infinite Possibilities > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Software as a translation > > Oh, I agree. It must be clearly marked. But why not mark the User > interface? Everything under this tab is considered OGC type of thing. > You are still displaying the information, just in a different way than
> on paper. It seems to me that if you can mark a pdf file as clearly OGC, > even if it is full of pictures like hieroglyphics ;-) why not ogc the > picture representation of the user interface? If the user interface depicts derivative material, it certainly must be OGC. But that may not be sufficient. The code behind that user interface is possibly also derivative of OGC. That makes it OGC. And that means it must be clearly indicated, whatever that means in the software world. Martin L. Shoemaker Martin L. Shoemaker Consulting, Software Design and UML Training [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.MartinLShoemaker.com http://www.UMLBootCamp.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
