On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, John M. Zulauf wrote:
> I thought that the return value from getProc was NOT supposed to be
> interpreted as an exsistance flag for any extension.
Yes - we already agreed this **AGES** ago.
> I say we require a NON-null return (that is in fact the only truely context
> independent possibility) which will either noop or error (to address your
> concern). This removes the requirement for NULL test AND the temptation to
> incorrectly associate getProc with getString as the appropriate means to
> determine exsistance of an extension.
Yes.
Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
Raytheon Systems Inc. (817)619-2466 (Fax)
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
