In your message of 23 November 1999 you write:
> Thomas Roell wrote:
> >
> > In your message of 23 November 1999 you write:
> >
> > > Whose copyright is going to be on the glext.h header file?
> > > Could the OpenGL ARB hold the copyright?
> > >
> > > I started a glext.h for Mesa 3.3 and would be happy
> > > to contribute it for merging with Thomas's and Michael's
> > > glext.h files.
> >
> > Definitively. Here is my proto. Could you e-mail me yours quickly ...
>
>
> Before merging code, I'd like to see some progress on the copyright
> issue which I raised. I propose that the XFree86 license be applied to
> the header, with joint copyright ownership. There is no reason for any
> individual copyright owner to give up his or her individual copyright.
> Here is some contract wording that should work in this situation:
Ah, guess I left the current one in ;-) I have no objection going with
the original X11 copyright. However, does this file need a copyright
at all ?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Roell /\ An imperfect plan executed violently
Xi Graphics / \/\ _ is far superior to a perfect plan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / / \ \
/ Oelch! \ \ George Patton
