[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:58:08AM -0700, Jon Trulson wrote: > | On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Nick Triantos wrote: > | > > | > Now that the source code to GLU has been open-sourced by SGI, does everyone > | > agree that this binary should be distributed from that code base, and that > | > no individual vendors should ship their own versions of GLU? > | > > | > | ...I believe that Mesa uses a C only version. > | Will Mesa be using the SGI GLU from here on out? > > Brian will have to say for sure, but my understanding is that Mesa's > GLU will continue to exist and be developed at least for the near > term. For example, Gareth Hughes believes his tessellator is more > robust than the one in SGI's GLU, so at the very least some testing > and code consolidation is likely to take place. Right. Mesa will probably include its existing GLU for the next version. In the mean time, Gareth should do some comparative analysis of the SI tessellator vs Mesa's tesselator to determine which is better. -Brian
