On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, David Blythe wrote:
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:58:01 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Blythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [oglbase-discuss] Everyone agree that GLU is now a solved
> problem?
>
> | Hmmm. You're saying that vendors should never ship GLU? Just
[...]
> I think it would be good to get everyone to agree to base their
> libGLU on the open source version. There are already several bug
> fixes in the open source version. It would also be good to have
> installations avoid stomping other versions (nick's suggestion
> of not shipping it at all addresses this), but I think this is
> going to be messy in the short term. Perhaps we could agree
> on having a standard rpm that just contains GLU located somewhere
> that anyone can include as part of their set of driver rpms.
>
I have absolutely no problem with that ;-) We will still want to
include whatever is the 'standard' GLU with the drivers though until this
trickles down to the various dists...
[...]
--
Jon Trulson work: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], home: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xi Graphics, Inc. http://www.xig.com
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP: C23F328A721264E7 B6188192EC733962
PGP keys at http://radscan.com/~jon/PGPKeys.txt
#include <stddisclaimer.h>
You talk like a Ferengi.
