On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Michael Gold wrote:
> If I were tasked with interpreting the results, I would note that at least
> one person who voted for (a) preferred (b). So (c) wins, 6-5-1.
Yes - but that person voted (a) *specifically* to avoid (c) - so to use
that tactical vote as a way to get (c) would be WRONG.
Look, it's a tied decision - someone had to decide - they did - let's move
on.
> I actually think (b) is the best compromise, and I don't think anyone on
> either side of the fence would strongly object to it.
But *nobody* voted for it.
> How about if the 12 people who voted, and nobody else, re-vote with an order
> of preference? I would hate to overlook a good compromise just because
> people were too polarized on this issue. If you vote on this first tally,
> please respond ASAP with your ranking.
I disagree with re-voting - let's get this thing done and over with.
(Yes, I know it came out the way I wanted - but you'll just have to take
my word for it that I would have given up if it had come out the other way).
Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax)
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
