On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Thomas Roell wrote: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/ABI/glext.h > > Two things that should be changed: > > 1. The defines (types/tokens) should be per extensions, and guarded > properly, so that they are only defined, if the extension has not > been defined yet in gl.h. I know that in theory there should never > be conflicts, but it would be just nicer to deal with. I believe our standards document states that explicitly. > 2. Explicite function prototypes should go away. Either you use > wglGetProcAddress() or glXGetProcAddressARB() to retieve the > extension functions. Hence there are no external declarations > needed. In fact it better if the compile can issue a warning about > an undeclared function if a direct reference is encountered. To be clear about this - they should not be in glext.h - but they can still be in gl.h since that's implementation-specific. Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Leath Muller
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES... Thomas Roell
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Brett Johnson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Richard Hecker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Brian Paul
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Jon Leech
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Thomas Roell
