On 2/14/07, Bob the Hamster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Er, I think I've lost at least one layer of atribution, there, but hey. > > > > The advantage of not unlumping is, well, not unlumping. The time saved > > is the initial read-through of the rpg file and writing all the > > smaller files. It would at least be spread out a little if we used > > lazy unlumping, and only wrote files as we needed them, but at that > > point the speed penalties might be occurring at a worse time. Is a big > > pause at the start better than a small pause in the middle? > > > > Simon > > > > Actually, we already have quite decent support for pre-unlumped files. > > All we are missing is the ability for a renamed copy of game.exe to > autoload a similarly named .rpgdir in the same folder. > > --- > Bob the Hamster
Oh, really? I didn't notice. Someone ought to do that then ;) _______________________________________________ ohrrpgce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
