On 7/21/07, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:37:19PM +1200, Ralph Versteegen wrote: > > On 7/21/07, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Mike Caron wrote: > > > > On 7/20/07, James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How about her.st.hp and her.sta(0)? > > > > > > > > Win. It works for me. > > > > > > Okay, I'll do it now. > > > > > > > Hold on! Why on earth don't you just do this: > > > > Union Stats > > stat(11) as integer > > Type > > hp as integer > > mp as integer > > str as integer > > acc as integer > > def as integer > > dog as integer > > mag as integer > > wil as integer > > spd as integer > > ctr as integer > > foc as integer > > hits as integer > > End Type > > End Union > > > > It works in 0.16, and it's less ugly. Did everyone forget about RGBcolor? > > We did that but with sta(11) as integer at the end rather than at the > beginning. Does it work differently when it is in a different order? > > > Now, why did you two call the array sta instead of stat? (Also, it > > should have a ubound of 11, not 12) I would commit this, but I want to > > rename sta. > > I'll fix the ubound. Thanks. > > I was reading "sta" as "st[at] a[rray]" >
No, it DOES work: I just tested it! It doesn't matter whether the array is at the end or the beginning, I removed the type wrapping the union: that is what FB0.16 doesn't like. TMC _______________________________________________ ohrrpgce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
