On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:02:03PM +1200, Ralph Versteegen wrote: > On 5 June 2010 08:11, James Paige <[email protected]> wrote: > > > /script/gameover_script > > /script/loadgame_script > > > > These are both ints. They store the id number of those script triggers. > > What would be the consequence of storing the names of the scripts > > instead? > > A plottrigger already encodes the name of the script, not its id > number. But because it's possible for these to be set by a script to a > script id number (which won't correspond to a plottrigger if the > script isn't a plotscript), storing the name of the script would > probably be better. IIRC, the plottrigger also becomes useless if the > name of the script changes (other than indicating in Custom that the > script has gone missing), so trigger ID and name should be perfectly > equivalent ways to store a script handle. >
So if I changed this to store a string, that would be a redundant, and wouldn't provide any actual benefit? ... or would it only be a benefit for old-style scripts and no-change for new-style scripts? --- James _______________________________________________ Ohrrpgce mailing list [email protected] http://lists.motherhamster.org/listinfo.cgi/ohrrpgce-motherhamster.org
