On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:25:03PM +0000, Bayard Bell wrote: > The packaging is slightly tricky because there are two further sets of lisp > packages to make xemacs properly useful. I've packaged them separately in > case people want a really minimal install but also provided metapackages > (editor/xemacs/xemacs-gnome-full, editor/xemacs/xemacs-x11-full, and > editor/xemacs/xemacs-nox11). There's a bit of overlap between emacs and > xemacs, so for the time being I've made the latter depend on the former. A > follow-on change would be to patch so that the shared executables have an > alternate name under xemacs and are called by those names from it (this is > what Debian appears to do). > > https://bitbucket.org/buffyg/oi-build/changeset/0f759efa96bd
>From a quick glance... 1) any reason you're not using the (shorter) Illumos CDDL header instead of the OSOL one? 2) I haven't paid much attention to oi-dev recently, but could mediated symlinks be used to sort out some of the executable names? (I don't use emacs, so I don't really care. :) ) Jeff. > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev -- I'm somewhere between geek and normal. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
