Please Nikola, Take your bike out and go for a ride in the countryside. This everlasting tirade/rant does not help the community or yourself. Just my 2c,
Bart 2016-07-25 10:05 GMT+02:00 Nikola M <[email protected]>: > On 07/24/16 05:40 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote: > > It is only democratic to pull the plug out of that page, showing that > > unfunished undemocratic documents like that should not have democratic > > support at all, promoting autoritarian rula and forcing it. > > > > Other then that, democratic way could be having links on that page > > pointing to Wiki so people can contribute there, but I choosed to have > > both of them presented concurrently, old useless one and newer rewriting > > of it. > > If work occurs on the Wiki then it is natural to point to it. > > But it is not natural to have stale and bad old version of it on site > for no reason. > > Plus xenol yesterday changed on-Wiki article name, that is not done on > existing articles. > Also xenol received reccomendations on how to edit Wiki in a right way. > > Only problem with it is that those "not to be tolerated" parts of > proposal are idiotic > and can't be glued into document, for not being precise and pushing > community into one-man slavery. > > > > >> > >> So xenol does not have right to PUT it on the site unilaterally. > >> > >> And I have ALL right to change and rephrase and contribute improved > >> version as I did on wiki. > > You have the right to setup a workspace but modifying website content is > subject to review. > > Great, xenol modified website without public review. Deal with it first. > > > > >> Plus I have rights on site to change documents, so why not I use them to > >> change? > > Because the rule on the website is: do not modify existing content > without acknowledgement and review. > > It also goes for NEW documents putting on site, or you have choosen to > turn blind eye to mandating things and protecting bad things on site, > but to forbid changes. > > I agree site is not a wiki, like I already said, but it is only obvious > you are not using your own rules like you describe. > > > > >> Xenol used it's right to change, by putting it, I don't see the > >> difference here. > > Adam created new content, you modified existing content. > > And that is great to do. > > Ok, then On Wiki, I created the content and he is modifyoing existing > content. > > I don't thing people should be forbidden to modify existing content. > > >> People tend to even say things without even looking, > >> and it is obvious that pushing document on the site is avoiding any > >> procedure and community effort and that is bad behaviour that tend to > >> spread. > >> As long it is there site is under occupation from that troll document. > >> > >> You can of course do whatever you want, it's always your free choice. > > Do you consider that the group of active developers steering the project > misbehave by proposing a form of organisation to help OpenIndiana move > forward? > > Of course they do. Plus they propose that trolling is the norm in this > community, obviously facilitated by makruger idea of ruling. > > I say everyone do what knows best that proposed document is clearly full > of logical and inhumane intentional mistakes that are to destroy this > community in the long run. > > Just take alook at the actual changes and refer on them and be on topic. > > > The need of a Code of Conduct was discussed within the group, ideas > emerged and are thus proposed to the community. > > Sounds pretty reasonable to me. :) > > No it is never discussed before in open, before making this topic, > anywhere, not even on IRC. > > If it is done in secrecy, that is grouse misbehaviour. > As I see there is no comunity but xenol pushing it on site and some > trolling content in it. > > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
