À mar. juil. 26 00:14:52 2016 GMT+0100, Nikola M a écrit :
> On 07/26/16 12:47 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
> > If I can explain another/a last time: there is no censorship as you were
> > asked to put your draft alongside the original proposal, kept for reference.
> > There will be one final Code of Conduct but there can be several strains to
> > serve as basis, as you were unhappy with Adam and Michael's formulation.
>
> This is not true, because there is only one on the site because you are
> afraid to have another on site.
>
> > In this frame we have an open process were different options can be
> > analyzed.
>
> Yet there is the only one option is on site and liked to Wiki..
>
> > By modifying the document in-place you deny people the right to formulate a
> > proposal:
>
> And Xenol(Adam) modified document again on site and in-place today and
> you don't react..
Did they modify/remove your proposal?
>
> > this type of censorship is exactly what you stand against, this seems a bit
> > counter-intuitive on your part.
>
> Censorship has many forms, like supporting creation of pages by one and
> forbidding and gagging another.
>
>
> And by the way I just received another threatening e-mail from Xenol,
> threatening to cut me off from the mailing list.
>
> So that is how things will be doing form now on folks:
> if you are against fascist texts made by makruger, xenol will gag you
> and send threats.
> No escape form trolling, because it is systematically supported.
Noboby wants things to escalate.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-de
--
Thanks for sailing Jolla :)
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
