29 августа 2016 г. 21:15:47 CEST, "Мартин Бохниг via oi-dev" <[email protected]> пишет: > >Ken, > >sure, I'm glad to do that. But my build machine is too outdated. >I perhaps should upgrade the entire host to Hipster's latest MATE iso >level (or I do that on the old laptop for now). >And yes, thankfully there is already one where Alexander has included >my DRM/KMS Sol12 backport diffs from July on August 20th (not the >original iso/usb that were publicly announced 4 days earlier). >I fyi had requested the OpenSXCE community to test the Hipster iso (and >also tested it myself on Ivy and reported to Hipster-core via OFFlist >emails, as you know) : > >https://twitter.com/OpenSXCE/status/768684093584379904 > >http://pastebin.com/raw/MYba5A9q > >As for xhci: Do you really think my instructions or now cancelled src >port beginnings are still wanted or needed, now after RM published his >webrev yesterday? > >If you think yes, then I'm glad to publish the instructions how to make >the Sol11 bins work on OpenSolaris (while at the same time making the >entire installation fall under Oracle's Solaris 11 license terms) ? >As for my xhci src port: RM is much further with that, as I outlined >earlier I started working on this only after I finished the Grub2 >UEFI32 Atom Tablet port. >But the steps how to get Sol11's xhci and usb stack working if the user >is willing and ready to turn his installation fully under Oracle's >licensing, then no problem, glad to describe this if anybody wants. >This probably only applies to private non-commercial users, who are >free to use Oracle Solaris 11 for testing for a while. >Businesses can only legally do this if they already have a valid >commercial Oracle license. But those that do would probably not run >OpenSolaris, but Solaris 11.x in the first place. > >So just advise what the community wants (or perhaps the community >itself should tell me). > > >-- >best regards >%martin bochnig > > > > > >>Понедельник, 29 августа 2016, 17:50 UTC от ken mays ><[email protected]>: >> >>Martin, >> >>Feel free to implement the full patch. I tested the ccsm and other >methods but didn't like the 'user (non-GUI)' feel of it. >>I agree on the previous visual effects GUI model you mentioned.. >> >>We also have a recent GNOME ISO/USB build, but it may not have the DRM >update. Check with Alp on that. >>I'd like to see us add the XHCI update as well so we can test all of >this at current state... >> >>~ Ken > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >oi-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
I, for one, would be interested to be "in the know" regarding xhci, especially if it is legal :-) BTW, the old DRM radeon driver which was dropped - is it the 'radeon' that was loaded by X.org - where this spring for the first time i had a non-plainold-vesa support for my APU (CPU+GPU chip)? Or is it another stack of bits that call themselves drivers? ;) Jim -- Typos courtesy of K-9 Mail on my Samsung Android _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
