Hi Aurelien,
thanks for this update, you spotted it well. That's the typical situation on hosts with both Intel GPU and NVidia GPU. But usually all it causes is that GLX and DRI don't come up and that Compiz cannot be used. It would make me wonder very much if this is the actual root cause here which causes THIS: [ 341.863] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 285 Especially after THAT already came up before: [ 340.943] (II) intel(0): Allocated new frame buffer 1920x1080 stride 7680, tiled [ 340.948] (II) UXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations: [ 340.948] (II) solid [ 340.948] (II) copy [ 340.948] (II) composite (RENDER acceleration) [ 340.948] (II) put_image [ 340.948] (II) get_image [ 340.948] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] Setup complete [ 340.948] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] DRI driver: i965 [ 340.948] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] VDPAU driver: i965 Nevertheless, it is an additional problem. And being too much focused on [ 341.863] (II) intel(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 285 made me miss it, so thaks for your sharp eyes :) Regards, %martin >Пятница, 2 сентября 2016, 16:42 UTC от Aurélien Larcher ><aurelien.larc...@gmail.com>: > >On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Alexander Jung < a.j...@scilset.de > wrote: >> Hello Martin, >> >> starting X without xorg.conf results in the same proplem. >> >> The Xorg.0.log is here ... >> >> http://vorschau.zebworx.com/OI/Xorg.0.log-without-xorg.conf > >I have an innocent side question: > >(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so: >ld.so.1: Xorg: fatal: >/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so: open failed: No such >file or directory > >Does ogl-select get confused by the presence of both Nvidia and Intel adapters? > >Best regards > >Aurelien >
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
